$orif intertrochanteric fracture cpt$ $orif intertrochanteric fracture cpt$

Early operation and early mobilisation resulted in a good functional outcome in all patients. There was no mechanical failure of the implants despite the early patient mobilisation. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to the studied parameters. Union of the fracture was achieved in all patients. All the patients were mobilised in the first 24 h postoperatively, regardless of the fracture type, and weight bearing was permitted as tolerated.

$orif intertrochanteric fracture cpt$

There were no complications during surgery. All the patients were treated within 36 h of their accident. The mobility score was used to assess the pre-injury and postoperative mobility status. Operation time, fluoroscopy time, blood transfusion and complications were recorded. Regular clinical and radiological review was done 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The mean follow-up time was 8 months (6 –12). Twenty fractures were stable and 92 unstable.

$orif intertrochanteric fracture cpt$

The average age of these patients was 78 years. Fifty-six patients were treated with Gamma nail implants, and 56 were treated with ACE trochanteric nail. One hundred and twelve patients were randomised on admission into two treatment groups. We report a randomised prospective study comparing two implants, the Gamma trochanteric nail and the ACE trochanteric nail, in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly.

$orif intertrochanteric fracture cpt$

Orif intertrochanteric fracture cpt